130 A.3d 950

In re Robert WILKEY, Respondent.

No. 14-BG-1000.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Filed Nov. 26, 2014.

BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and RUIZ, Senior Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Pennsylvania for a total of 30 months, this court’s September 24, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a period of 30 months with his reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause but did file a timely affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Robert Wilkey is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 30 months, nunc pro tunc to September 24, 2104. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007); In re Coleman, 919 A.2d 1135, 1137 n. 4 (D.C.2007).

In re Wilkey
130 A.3d 950

Case Details

Name
In re Wilkey
Decision Date
Nov 26, 2014
Citations

130 A.3d 950

Jurisdiction
District of Columbia

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!