250 A.D.2d 382 672 N.Y.S.2d 687

Michael Wild et al., Respondents, v Bausch & Lome Incorporated, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Defendant. Cohen’s Fashion Optical, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

[672 NYS2d 687]

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 7, 1997, which order, inter alia, only conditionally *383granted appellant’s motion for an order striking plaintiffs’ note of issue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

A 1998 order in this action striking plaintiffs’ case from the TAP calendar renders the appeal moot (see, e.g., Westinghouse Elec. Supply Co. v Pyramid Champlain Co., 193 AD2d 928, 932). Were the appeal not moot, we would find no improvident exercise of discretion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Wild v. Bausch & Lome Inc.
250 A.D.2d 382 672 N.Y.S.2d 687

Case Details

Name
Wild v. Bausch & Lome Inc.
Decision Date
May 5, 1998
Citations

250 A.D.2d 382

672 N.Y.S.2d 687

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!