315 F. App'x 456

In Re: Rodney Eugene SMITH, Petitioner.

No. 09-1106.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.

Decided: March 9, 2009.

Rodney Eugene Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Eugene Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for writ of error coram nobis. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Smith
315 F. App'x 456

Case Details

Name
In re Smith
Decision Date
Mar 9, 2009
Citations

315 F. App'x 456

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!