This is an action of contract on a fire insurance policy, which below was consolidated with tbe case of Ned Bardwell et al. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., Ltd., ante page 106, 163 Atl. 633. It was tried below and beard here with that case, and involves tbe same questions. For tbe reasons specified in our opinion in that case, judgment in this case is affirmed, and petition for new trial is dismissed with costs.
105 Vt. 126
Ned Bardwell et al. v. The Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Company.
November Term, 1932.
Present: Powers, C. X, Slack, Moulton, Thompson, and Graham, JJ.
Opinion filed January 4, 1933.
Shields & Conant and Thorp & Branch (of Manchester, N. H.) for tbe defendant.
Searles é Graves, Leon D. Ripley (of Colebrook, N. II.), and Clarence A. Warren (of Boston, Mass.) for tbe plaintiffs.
Bardwell v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance
105 Vt. 126
Case Details
105 Vt. 126
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!