(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed January 13, 1893.)
Appeal—Case.
An appeal will not be heard by the general term where the case does not contain the judgment-roll nor an index as required by rule 42.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of . $3,300.17, and from an ord§r denying the motion for a new trial, in an action for personal injuries received while alighting from a car on the New York & Brooklyn bridge.
William H. Clark and Almet F. Jenks (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley, of counsel), for app’lts;
Chas. J. Patterson, for resp’t.
This case having been submitted, upon taking up the same for the purposes of decision it is found that in the papers no judgment roll has been printed, and the case contains no index such as is required by rule 42 of the rules of practice. The case must,, therefore, be stricken from the calendar.
Yan Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Follett, JJ., concur.
50 N.Y. St. Rptr. 758
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!