195 Wis. 660

Luebke, Respondent, vs. Danaher and wife, Appellants.

April 2

May 8, 1928.

For the appellants there was a brief by Roehr & Steinmetz of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Chris Steinmetz.

H. H. Bodenstab of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

Rosenberry, J.

Those participating in the decision of this case are equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed. Under such circumstances the judgment must of necessity be affirmed in accordance with the rule.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Luebke v. Danaher
195 Wis. 660

Case Details

Name
Luebke v. Danaher
Decision Date
May 8, 1928
Citations

195 Wis. 660

Jurisdiction
Wisconsin

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!