98 Tex. Crim. 117

Eusebio Ortez v. The State.

No. 8451.

Decided May 28, 1924.

Rehearing denied June 27, 1924.

The opinion states the ease.

M. C. Nelson, for appellant.

Tom Garrard, Attorney for the State and Grover C. Morris, Assistant Attorney for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

The State’s testimony, if believed, is sufficient to show that' the appellant committed the offense charged.

No bills of exception are found bringing forward for review any rulings of the trial court. The motion for new trial raises no questions which can be reviewed save the sufficiency of the evidence.

The indictment seems regular. We discern nothing in the record requiring or justifying a reversal of the judgment. An affirmance is ordered.

Affirmed.

Ortez v. State
98 Tex. Crim. 117

Case Details

Name
Ortez v. State
Decision Date
May 28, 1924
Citations

98 Tex. Crim. 117

Jurisdiction
Texas

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!