99 N.J. Eq. 424

Rose E. Fike, respondent, v. Roy E. Fike, appellant.

[Decided February 1st, 1926.]

.Messrs. McCarter & English, for the respondent.

Mr. Robert Newton Crane, for the appellant.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below hy Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Pabkee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaedneb, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Kone.

Fike v. Fike
99 N.J. Eq. 424

Case Details

Name
Fike v. Fike
Decision Date
Feb 1, 1926
Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 424

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!