648 F. App'x 420

In re SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Petitioner.

No. 16-20267.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 13, 2016.

Revised May 19, 2016.

Robert Peter Lombardi, Esq., Samuel Zurik, III, Kullman Firm, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner.

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Schlumberger Technology Corporation (“STC”) petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus challenging the district court’s order granting Plaintiff Ryan Riva’s motion for conditional certification under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

*421The district court’s order contains no substantive analysis of its decision to grant conditional certification. Although there is generally no “inflexible rule requiring district courts to file a written order explaining their decisions,”1 in this case the district court’s “lack of explanation makes it impossible for us to determine” whether mandamus relief would be appropriate here.2

We therefore remand for the limited purpose to allow the district court to supplement its order. Upon limited remand, the district court should enter a memorandum or order that explains its decision to grant conditional certification. After the district court’s entry of an explanation, the case should be returned to this panel, which will retain jurisdiction during the pendency of the limited remand.3

STC’s petition is HELD IN ABEYANCE and the case is REMANDED.

In re Schlumberger Technology Corp.
648 F. App'x 420

Case Details

Name
In re Schlumberger Technology Corp.
Decision Date
May 13, 2016
Citations

648 F. App'x 420

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!