2 Cranch 30 2 D.C. 30

United States v. Bascadore.

Tbe confession of a prisoner; taken upon oatb, cannot be used against bim upon bis trial.

Indictment for burglary.

The Attorney for the United States, offered to prove by Mr. Faw, a justice of the peace, that the prisoner sent for him to come to the gaol, where the prisoner confessed the fact and named his associates. This confession ' was taken upon oath, as it charged the accomplices. *

The Court,

(nem. con.) upon the authority of McNally, p. 47, Rule 12, rejected the testimony, no goods having been found in consequence of the confession. The statute of Phillip and Mary does not say whether the confession should be upon oath or not. From the silence of the act in that respect the judges have drawn the inference that the confession is not to be upon Oath; and it is said that policy forbids the using of such declarations against the prisoner.

United States v. Bascadore
2 Cranch 30 2 D.C. 30

Case Details

Name
United States v. Bascadore
Decision Date
Nov 1, 1811
Citations

2 Cranch 30

2 D.C. 30

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!