29 Cust. Ct. 365

No. 56840.

Intercontinental Metal Corp. v. United States,

protest 175413-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in controversy consists of copper scrap of which metal is the component material of chief value and that it is secondhand and fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Intercontinental Metal Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 365

Case Details

Name
Intercontinental Metal Corp. v. United States
Decision Date
Aug 26, 1952
Citations

29 Cust. Ct. 365

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!