402 F. App'x 217

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David Paul PETERS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-30384.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 29, 2010.

Carl E. Rostad, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lucas J. Foust, Esquire, Foust Law Office, P.C., Bozeman, MT, for Defendant Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

David Paul Peters appeals from his 262-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(B) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Peters contends that his counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge the district court’s finding that the conspiracy started in 2005, giving rise to a career offender designation that led to a higher advisory guidelines range. Although we generally do not address claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct review, we can consider the merits where the record on appeal is sufficiently developed to permit determination of the issue. See United States v. Alferahin, 433 F.3d 1148, 1160-61 n. 6 (9th Cir.2006). The record reflects that Peters’s counsel was not deficient, nor was Peters prejudiced by any possibly deficient performance. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Peters
402 F. App'x 217

Case Details

Name
United States v. Peters
Decision Date
Oct 29, 2010
Citations

402 F. App'x 217

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!