Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien and Hiscook, JJ.
Matter of Blatt v. Balcer, 119 App. Div. 886, affirmed.
(Argued October 7, 1907;
decided October 22, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 10, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to certify to a payoll containing petitioner’s name.
*560 I. Batch Louis for appellant.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Royal F. T. Riggs, Theodore Connoly and William B. Crowell of counsel), for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien and Hiscook, JJ.
189 N.Y. 559
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!