72 Ohio St. 3d 40

Cleveland Bar Association v. Podor.

[Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Podor (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 40.]

(No. 94-2648

Submitted January 24, 1995

Decided April 19, 1995.)

*41 Edward T. Clarke, Warren P. Geiger, Robert H. Gillespy II and Mary Cibella, Bar counsel, for relator.

Synenberg & Associates and Roger M. Synenberg, for respondent.

*42 Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that respondent complete a two-year monitored probation as set forth by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.

Wright, J.,

dissenting. Because I would not suspend respondent’s six-month suspension, I respectfully dissent.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Podor
72 Ohio St. 3d 40

Case Details

Name
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Podor
Decision Date
Apr 19, 1995
Citations

72 Ohio St. 3d 40

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!