102 N.J.L. 225

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM MALAY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Submitted May 29, 1925

Decided September 10, 1925.

Por the plaintiff in error, Elmer W. Romine.

For the defendant in error, James H. Bolitho, prosecutor of the pleas.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmanee — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

State v. Malay
102 N.J.L. 225

Case Details

Name
State v. Malay
Decision Date
Sep 10, 1925
Citations

102 N.J.L. 225

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!