Burr v. City of Columbus 249 U.S. 415, 63 L. Ed. 679, 39 S. Ct. 354, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1676, SCDB 1918-036

249 U.S. 415 • 63 L. Ed. 679 • 39 S. Ct. 354 • 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1676 • SCDB 1918-036

BURR ET AL., PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF PARKINSON & BURR, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO, ET AL.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

No. 739.

Argued January 10, 1919.

Decided April 14, 1919.

Decided upon the authority of Columbus By., Power & bight Co. v. Columbus, ante, 399.

Affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Mr. Joseph S. Clark, with whom Mr. Karl E. Burr, Mr. Henry A. McCarthy, Mr. Henry J. Booth and Mr. W. O. Henderson were on the briefs, for appellants.

Mr. Henry L. Scarlett, with whom Mr. David F. Pugh was on the brief, for appellees.

Memorandum by direction of the court, by

Mr. Justice Day.

This case was argued and submitted with No. 715, just decided, ante, 399. It was brought by owners and holders of more than $200,000 of certain mortgage bonds of the Street Railway-Company. The bill alleged diversity of Citizenship, and also rights alleged to arise under the Constitution. The case was heard upon motion for a temporary injunction and upon defendant’s motion to dismiss the bill. The injunction ivas refused, the motion to dismiss was granted and a decree entered accordingly.' To all intents the case is controlled by the decision in No. 715. The decree of the District Court is

Affirmed.

Burr v. City of Columbus
249 U.S. 415 • 63 L. Ed. 679 • 39 S. Ct. 354 • 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1676 • SCDB 1918-036

Case Details

Name
Burr v. City of Columbus
Decision Date
Apr 14, 1919
Citations

249 U.S. 415

63 L. Ed. 679

39 S. Ct. 354

1919 U.S. LEXIS 1676

SCDB 1918-036

Jurisdiction
United States
Court
Supreme Court of the United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!