143 F. App'x 886

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jhonny TINOCO-OROZCO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-50490.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 20, 2005.

*887Mark A. Young, USLA—Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David R. Reed, Esq., Law Office of David R. Reed, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Jhonny Tinoco-Orozeo appeals his 97-month sentence following a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Tinoco-Orozco was sentenced before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the United States Sentencing Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906 (9th Cir.2005) (extending the Ameline remand to cases involving non-constitutional Booker error).

REMANDED.

United States v. Tinoco-Orozco
143 F. App'x 886

Case Details

Name
United States v. Tinoco-Orozco
Decision Date
Sep 20, 2005
Citations

143 F. App'x 886

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!