The ap|>ellee has moved to dismiss this appeal because it is from an interlocutory order denying a preliminary injunction, and the counsel for the appellant has signified his consent that the motion be sustained. The appeal is therefore dismissed on the authority of Wire Co. v. Boyce (C. C. A.) 104 Fed. 172, and West-inghonse Air-Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co. (C. C. A.) 104 Fed. 622.
108 F. 571
AMERICAN SCHOOL-FURNITURE CO. v. VAUGHT et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
May 8, 1901.)
No. 727.
Appeal — Appealable Order — Denial op Preliminary Injunction.
Under section 7 of Act March 3, 1891, creating Hie circuit courts of apRonls, as amended "by Act June G, 1900, an appeal to such court does not lie from an interlocutory order denying a preliminary injunction.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District. of Indiana.
On Motion io Dismiss Appeal.
R. P. Elliott, for appellant.
V. R'. Lockwood, for appellee.
Before WOODS, JENKINS, and GROSSCUP, Circuit Judges.
American School-Furniture Co. v. Vaught
108 F. 571
Case Details
108 F. 571
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!