Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Yvon Dort in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examina*476tion of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dort’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
443 F. App'x 475
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yvon DORT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-10213
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 19, 2011.
Robert E. O’Neill, David Paul Rhodes, Patricia A. Willing, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, J. Bishop Ravenel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Charles E. Taylor, Jr., Law Office of Charles E. Taylor, Jr., Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Dort
443 F. App'x 475
Case Details
443 F. App'x 475
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!