7 N.J. Misc. 514

BLACK AND WHITE OPERATING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EMIL GROSBART, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted October term, 1928

Decided May 27, 1929.

Before Justices Teenohaed, Kalisch and Lloyd.

Eor the appellant, Harry Levin.

Eor the respondent, George F. Seymour, Jr.

Pee Curiam.

Since the per curiam opinion was filed in this case our attention has been called by counsel to a supplemental state of the case which appears to have been signed by the trial judge two months after the original state of the ease had been signed.

Without passing on the sufficiency of such a state of the record, we have examined the reasons urged for reversal and find them without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

Black & White Operating Co. v. Grosbart
7 N.J. Misc. 514

Case Details

Name
Black & White Operating Co. v. Grosbart
Decision Date
May 27, 1929
Citations

7 N.J. Misc. 514

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!