5 N.J. Misc. 302

HETTIE HERTZMARK, PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN CONWAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DEFENDANTS. GEORGE A. CASTEEN, PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN CONWAY. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DEFENDANTS.

Argued February 23, 1927

Decided February 26, 1927.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Campbell.

Eor the prosecutors, Clifton C. Shinn.

For the defendants, Joseph B. Pershie.

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the affidavits and argument of counsel, we come to the conclusion that the application is without substantial merit.

A writ of certiorari is therefore refused. If a rule to show cause was made herein, the same will be discharged.

Defendants are entitled to costs.

Hertzmark v. Conway
5 N.J. Misc. 302

Case Details

Name
Hertzmark v. Conway
Decision Date
Feb 26, 1927
Citations

5 N.J. Misc. 302

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!