We are satisfied that the court below was correct in confirming the report and order of the referee and dismissing the petitions for review, and deem it unnecessary to repeat the argument in support of these conclusions. In our opinion the petition to superintend and revise should be dismissed, at the cost of petitioners, and the decree of the trial court appealed from affirmed, at the cost of the appellants; and it is so ordered.
218 F. 987
BRAY et al. v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. (two cases). In re EVANSVILLE CONTRACT CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
December 7, 1914.)
Nos. 1246, 1260.
Appeal from and Petition to Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Law, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Parkers-burg, in Bankruptcy; Alston G. Dayton, Judge. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of the Evansville Contract Company. On petition by M. J. Bray and others to superintend and revise in matter of law certain proceedings resulting in a decree affirming a referee’s order in favor of the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, with separate appeal by Bray and others from the same decree.
Petition dismissed, and decree affirmed.
II. P. Camden, of Parkersburg, W. Va., for petitioners and appellants. B. M. Ambler, of Parkersburg, W. Va. (W. W. Van Winkle and Mason G. Ambler, both of Parkersburg, W. Va., on the brief), for respondent and appellee.
Before KNAPP and WOODS, Circuit Judges, and MeDOWELL, District Judge.
Bray v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
218 F. 987
Case Details
218 F. 987
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!