135 Ohio St. (n.s.) 94

The State, ex rel. Baird, Appellant, v. Schroy, Mayor, et al., Appellees.

(No. 27240

Decided February 23, 1939.)

*96Mr. W. E. Pardee and Messrs. Burch & Baird, for appellant.

Mr. Wade DeWoody, director of law, and Mr. Ear-old L. Mull, for appellees.

By the Court.

By Section 109 of the amended charter, the people of Akron protected persons holding positions pursuant to appointment from eligible lists and those who had been continuously in the service in the same position for three years preceding the effective date of the amendments. The appellant did not come within either of those requirements, and therefore the judgment of'the Court of Appeals should be, and is, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Baird v. Schroy
135 Ohio St. (n.s.) 94

Case Details

Name
State ex rel. Baird v. Schroy
Decision Date
Feb 23, 1939
Citations

135 Ohio St. (n.s.) 94

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!