282 S.W.3d 412

Dameion PULLUM, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 91402.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 5, 2009.

Alexandra Johnson, Saint Louis, MO, for Petitioner/Appellant.

Christopher A. Koster, Shaun J. Mackel-prang, Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dameion Pullum (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting *413forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Pullum v. State
282 S.W.3d 412

Case Details

Name
Pullum v. State
Decision Date
May 5, 2009
Citations

282 S.W.3d 412

Jurisdiction
Missouri

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!