Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the defendant’s agents had the implied authority to make the agreement for the payment of the $35, and that the law implies a promise on defendant’s part to repay the sum paid him by mistake.
125 N.Y.S. 1144
SHILLING, Appellant, v. WILLETS, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
October 7, 1910.)
Action by George B. Shilling against Andrew J. Willets.
Shilling v. Willets
125 N.Y.S. 1144
Case Details
125 N.Y.S. 1144
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!