John Francisco, appointed counsel for Jose Mata-Camaeho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mata-Camacho’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
386 F. App'x 894
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose MATA-CAMACHO, a.k.a. Ramiro Suselo Hernandez, a.k.a. Audenes Camacho-Catalan, a.k.a. Hector Luis Rodriguez, a.k.a. David Jason Ortega, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-16098
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 12, 2010.
Michelle Schieber, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John R. Francisco, Sinnreich & Francisco, Macon, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
*895Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Mata-Camacho
386 F. App'x 894
Case Details
386 F. App'x 894
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!