386 F. App'x 894

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose MATA-CAMACHO, a.k.a. Ramiro Suselo Hernandez, a.k.a. Audenes Camacho-Catalan, a.k.a. Hector Luis Rodriguez, a.k.a. David Jason Ortega, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-16098

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 12, 2010.

Michelle Schieber, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John R. Francisco, Sinnreich & Francisco, Macon, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*895Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John Francisco, appointed counsel for Jose Mata-Camaeho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mata-Camacho’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mata-Camacho
386 F. App'x 894

Case Details

Name
United States v. Mata-Camacho
Decision Date
Jul 12, 2010
Citations

386 F. App'x 894

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!