16 Cal. 377

ELLIOTT v. SHAW et al.

Ay affidavit by defendant that he was under the impression, when he retained counsel in a cause, that the time to answer had not expired; that he did not recollect the precise day upon which the summons and complaint were served; that he was quite ill at the time, and did not as carefully note the time as he otherwise would, is insufficient to open a judgment by default.

Appeal from the Twelfth District.

Suit against the drawer of a bill of exchange. Defendant appeals from the order denying the motion to set aside the judgment.

G. G. Fenner, for Appellant.

H. H. Haight, for Respondent.

Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J. and Cope, J. concurring.

Judgment in this case was entered by default, and the motion to open the same was denied. The excuse proffered by the defendant, in the affidavit upon which the motion was made, for his failure to plead —that he was under the impression, when he retained counsel in the case, that the time to answer had not expired; that he did not recollect the precise day upon which the summons and complaint were served; and that he was quite ill at the time, and did not as carefully *378note the time as he otherwise would have done—was entirely insufficient. It does not appear that Ms illness prevented Mm from attending to Ms business, or that it continued beyond the day. There is hardly a case where judgment of default has been entered, in wliich grounds equally forcible for opening the same might not be presented.

Judgment affirmed.

Elliott v. Shaw
16 Cal. 377

Case Details

Name
Elliott v. Shaw
Decision Date
Jan 1, 1970
Citations

16 Cal. 377

Jurisdiction
California

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!