95 So. 3d 398

Dr. Mitchell SENFT, Appellant, v. PATTERSON DENTAL SUPPLY, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D11-712.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 1, 2012.

Eric Ash of Shochet Law Group, Green-acres, for appellant.

Christopher D. Hale of Christopher D. Hale, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment entered in this contract action, as the ap-pellee failed to conclusively negate the affirmative defenses raised by appellant. See Corya v. Sanders, 76 So.3d 31, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Riverwood Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Litecrete, Inc., 69 So.3d 983, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). Moreover, the appel-lee relied in its affidavit in support of summary judgment on a contract (order form) which was never mentioned or relied upon as part of the contract in its complaint. At the very least, it raises a material issue of fact as to what constituted the contract between the parties. See, e.g., Grumman Ecosystems Corp. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 391 So.2d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Senft v. Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.
95 So. 3d 398

Case Details

Name
Senft v. Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.
Decision Date
Aug 1, 2012
Citations

95 So. 3d 398

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!