22 Ohio C.C. 339

(Eighth Circuit—Cuyahoga Co., O., Circ’t Court

January Term, 1901.)

Before Caldwell, Hale and Marvin, JJ.

THE UNITED HATTERS OF AMERICA v. LOEB & SHIRED.

Petition to enjoin from using trade designs — Where defective—

A petition in an action to enjoin defendants from using plaintiff’s trade design or 'device which merely alleges that defendants have been using such design or device, but not alleging that they are now using it, and containing no allegation of threatened injury in the future, is insufficient.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga county.-

*340 Sam Doerñer, for Plaintiff in Error.

/. H. Sampliner, for Defendants in Error.

Hale, J.

This action comes into this court by appeal. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition and rendered judgment for the defendant.

The action was prosecuted in the court of common pleas to enjoin the defendant from using, selling or displaying hats, caps, or goods of any description, bearing any imitation or counterfeit ©f a certain design or device adopted in form authorized by the statute by the plaintiff to distinguish products made, manufactured or prepared by the members of the association of workingmen, known as “The United Hatters of North America.”

After alleging the facts upon which the plaintiff relies to sustain its right to the exclusive use of such device, it is averred that the defendant so engaged in the sale, and display of hats and caps; that they have been using, selling and displaying hats and caps bearing imitations and counterfeits of the design and device of this plaintiff association.

It is nowhere alleged in the petition that the defendants are now using, selling or displaying hats and caps bearing any imitation of the design of which the plaintiff claims an exclusive use. There is no allegation of any threatened injury in the future by the defendant, of the plaintiff’s rights. For past offenses, an action at law is the plaintiff’s only remedy.

The demurrer to the petition was properly sustained in the court below, and the same entry may be made here.

United Hatters of America v. Loeb
22 Ohio C.C. 339

Case Details

Name
United Hatters of America v. Loeb
Decision Date
Jan 1, 1901
Citations

22 Ohio C.C. 339

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!