102 Fla. 1070 137 So. 276

J. H. Winchester, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Anton Hak, Jr., Defendant in Error.

137 So. 276.

Division B.

Decision filed October 1, 1931.

*1071Van Fleet, Collins & Miller, for Plaintiff in Error;

Booth cfe Dickenson, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— -This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court' that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Winchester v. Hak
102 Fla. 1070 137 So. 276

Case Details

Name
Winchester v. Hak
Decision Date
Oct 1, 1931
Citations

102 Fla. 1070

137 So. 276

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!