135 Tex. Crim. 60

Edward Francis Goodale v. The State.

No. 19844.

Delivered June 8, 1938.

*61The opinion states the case.

A. S. Baskett, of Dallas, and John J. Sargent and R. C. Roland, both of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

Graves, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at twelve years in the penitentiary.

This cause comes before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The motion for a new trial contains many matters alleged to be errors committed by the trial court, which we are unable to correctly appraise on account of the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exceptions.

The indictment appears to be proper, and all proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.

Goodale v. State
135 Tex. Crim. 60

Case Details

Name
Goodale v. State
Decision Date
Jun 8, 1938
Citations

135 Tex. Crim. 60

Jurisdiction
Texas

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!