An order vacating an arbitration award and directing a new arbitration before new arbitrators is final and appealable. (See, e.g., Matter of Milliken Woolens [Weber *651Knit Sportswear], 8 N Y 2d 1025, rearg. den. 8 N Y 2d 1157; Matter of Colony Liq. Distrs. [Local 669, Int. Brotherhood of Teamsters], 28 N Y 2d 596.) On the record before us, there can be no doubt that respondent knowingly waived its objection to the arbitrator Hessen when—after the latter affirmed his prior dealings with petitioner-appellant’s president and before the hearings commenced—it explicitly stated in writing that “ The panel is acceptable to the Parties.” Accordingly, the order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and petitioner’s motion to confirm the award granted.
30 N.Y.2d 649
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Baar & Beards, Inc., Appellant, and Oleg Cassini, Inc., Respondent.
Argued February 8, 1972;
decided March 16, 1972.
*650Robert S. Groban for appellant.
Donald S. Engel for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Beegan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Judge Burke dissents and votes to affirm on the majority opinion at the Appellate Division.
In re the Arbitration between Baar & Beards, Inc. & Oleg Cassini, Inc.
30 N.Y.2d 649
Case Details
30 N.Y.2d 649
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!