(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 8, 1912.)
Bail (§ 66*) — Appeal From— Sufficiency.
A recognizance on'appeal in a misdemean- or case -which did not state that the appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor or of any offense defined by law, or state the penalty assessed, was wholly insufficient.
[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Bail, Cent. Dig. §§ 279-283; Dec. Dig. § 66.*]
Appeal from Dallas County Court, at Daw; W. P. Whitehurst, Judge.
Bill Autry was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and he appeals.
Appeal dismissed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The appellant was •convicted for unlawfully carrying a pistol and fined $100. Upon the motion of the state •the appeal herein is dismissed because the recognizance is wholly insufficient in that it does not state that appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, nor does it state that he was convicted of any offense defined by law, nor does it state the penalty assessed.
The appeal is dismissed.
147 S.W. 251
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!