224 So. 2d 683

Raymond SPELL, Petitioner, v. TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.

No. 38627.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 9, 1969.

Angus W. Harriett, Palatka, for petitioner.

Robert C. Gobelman and Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, Jacksonville, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 2, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Spell v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc.
224 So. 2d 683

Case Details

Name
Spell v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc.
Decision Date
Jul 9, 1969
Citations

224 So. 2d 683

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!