State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Industrial Commission 58 Ohio St. 2d 458

58 Ohio St. 2d 458

The State, ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO et al., v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.

(No. 79-37

Decided June 27, 1979.)

*459 Messrs. Claymcm & Jaffy, Mr. Stewart R. Jaffy, and Mr. Malcolm L. Goodman, for relators.

Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. Michael J. Hickey, for respondents.

Goolidge, Wall, Matusoff, Womsley $'Lombard Co., L. P. A., Mr. Joseph A. O’Friel, Mr. John G. Lombard and Mr. Roger J. Makley, for intervening respondent Chrysler Corp.

Per Curiam.

Eelators have failed to allege facts givr ing rise to a clear legal duty entitling them to the writ of mandamus. Furthermore, relators do not allege that the commission lacks jurisdiction to act, but only that such action would be erroneous. If a tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the question before it, a writ of prohibition will not issue to prevent it from exercising that authority. State, ex rel. McCaffrey, v. Cleveland (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 346, 347.

Accordingly, the writs of mandamus and prohibition are denied.- .

Writs denied.

CeLEBREZZE, . C. J., HERBERT, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Industrial Commission
58 Ohio St. 2d 458

Case Details

Name
State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Industrial Commission
Decision Date
Jun 27, 1979
Citations

58 Ohio St. 2d 458

Jurisdiction
Ohio
Court
Supreme Court of Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!