10 La. App. 140

No. 10,711

Orleans

DEMACK MOTORS, CO., INC., v. HALLICK

(January 21, 1929. Opinion and Decree.)

(February 25, 1929. Rehearing Refused.)

McGiehan and Strauch, of New Orleans, attorneys for plaintiff, appellee.

Jose A. Morales, of New Orleans, attorney for defendant, appellant.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE.

GLEASON, J.

ad hoc. This is an action to recover from defendant, a married woman, a balance due on a promissory note signed by her, together with interest and attorney’s fees as stipulated in the act. The note was secured by a chattel mortgage on an automobile. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

*141OPINION.

The defense in this case is founded on the theory that, notwithstanding the note was made by the defendant individually, and that the automobile was purchased in her name, as a matter of fact and to the knowledge of the plaintiff, she was purchasing the machine for the account of the community; that, therefore, it is a community obligation.

There is nothing whatever in the record to support the defense. On the contrary, the record shows conclusively that the' automobile was purchased for the defendant for her own account, and the note was signed by her in her individual capacity. The husband was no party to the transaction whatever. She and her separate estate are, therefore, bound.

The judgment is correct and is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

Demack Motors, Co. v. Hallick
10 La. App. 140

Case Details

Name
Demack Motors, Co. v. Hallick
Decision Date
Jan 21, 1929
Citations

10 La. App. 140

Jurisdiction
Louisiana

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!