ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States 610 F.2d 785, Reversed and remanded.

610 F.2d 785 • Reversed and remanded.

ASG INDUSTRIES, INC., PPG Industries, Inc., Libbey-Owens-Ford Company, and C E Glass, Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Appeal No. 79-16.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Nov. 29, 1979.

*786Eugene L. Stewart, Frederick L. Ikenson, Washington, D. C., attorneys of record, for appellants.

Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., David M. Cohen, Director, Joseph I. Liebman, John J. Mahon, Sidney N. Weiss, New York City, for the U. S. ’

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, MILLER and PENN,* Judges.

MILLER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 82 Cust.Ct. —, C.D. 4788 (1979), which upheld the decision of the Secretary of the Treasury that float glass manufactured in Great Britain did not benefit from the payment or bestowal of a bounty or grant within the meaning of section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1303). For the same reasons set forth in the opinion in ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States, 610 F.2d 770, No. 79-15, decided concurrently herewith, the judgment of the Customs Court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

MARKEY, C. J., and RICH, J., dissent.

ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States
610 F.2d 785 • Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Name
ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date
Nov 29, 1979
Citations

610 F.2d 785

Reversed and remanded.

Jurisdiction
United States
Court
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!