333 F. App'x 229

Fernando GONZALEZ-LUCATERO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-70344.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.*

Filed Sept. 28, 2009.

Fernando Gonzalez-Lucatero, San Valley, NV, pro se.

Thomas J. Gullo, Esquire, Kurt B. Larson, Esquire, OIL, Stacy Stiffel Paddack, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Fernando Gonzalez-Lucatero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of Gonzalez-Lu-catero’s cancellation of removal application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). Gonzalez-Lucatero’s contention that the agency violated his due process rights by disregarding his evidence of hardship and misapplying the law to the facts of his case is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

Gonzalez-Lucatero v. Holder
333 F. App'x 229

Case Details

Name
Gonzalez-Lucatero v. Holder
Decision Date
Sep 28, 2009
Citations

333 F. App'x 229

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!