Board of Trade v. City of Newark 98 N.J.L. 555

98 N.J.L. 555

BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.

Submitted December 11, 1922

Decided February 1, 1923.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. L. 52.

For the respondent, Pitney, Hardin & 8'kinner.

For the appellant, Jerome T. Congleton.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chtbe Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Board of Trade v. City of Newark

98 N.J.L. 555

Case Details

Name

Board of Trade v. City of Newark

Decision Date

Feb 1, 1923

Citations

98 N.J.L. 555

Jurisdiction

New Jersey

Court

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!