36 F. App'x 905

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Allen WAGNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-50197.

D.C. No. CR-96-00779-RSWL-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002*

Decided May 29, 2002.

*906Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

John Allen Wagner appeals pro se the denial of his new-trial motion and post-trial motion to dismiss. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss.

On September 17, 2001, we remanded this appeal to the district court to conduct a hearing pursuant to United States v. Stolarz, 547 F.2d 108, 112 (9th Cir.1976) to determine whether Wagner’s March 19, 2001 notice of appeal was timely. On October 4, 2001, the district court found that Wagner’s notice of appeal was untimely. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(b). Although the district court invited Wagner to file a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, he did not.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4).

DISMISSED.

United States v. Wagner
36 F. App'x 905

Case Details

Name
United States v. Wagner
Decision Date
May 29, 2002
Citations

36 F. App'x 905

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!