Anderson v. Town of Chili Planning Board 12 N.Y.3d 901, 885 N.Y.S.2d 21, 913 N.E.2d 407

12 N.Y.3d 901 • 885 N.Y.S.2d 21 • 913 N.E.2d 407

[913 NE2d 407, 885 NYS2d 21]

In the Matter of Thomas Anderson et al., Appellants, v Town of Chili Planning Board et al., Respondents.

Decided June 30, 2009

*902APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (Janet D. Callahan of counsel), for appellants.

Keith E. O’Toole, Spencerport, for Town of Chili Planning Board, respondent.

Ward Norris Heller & Reidy LLP, Rochester (Jeffrey J. Harridine of counsel), for Metalico Rochester, Inc., respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, respondent Planning Board’s determinations issuing a conditional use permit and a negative declaration annulled and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, with directions to remand to the Planning Board for further proceedings for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (59 AD3d 1017, 1019-1020 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Anderson v. Town of Chili Planning Board
12 N.Y.3d 901 • 885 N.Y.S.2d 21 • 913 N.E.2d 407

Case Details

Name
Anderson v. Town of Chili Planning Board
Decision Date
Jun 30, 2009
Citations

12 N.Y.3d 901

885 N.Y.S.2d 21

913 N.E.2d 407

Jurisdiction
New York
Court
New York Court of Appeals

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!