Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. 346 F.2d 152

346 F.2d 152

Florence Lustig CROSSMAN, a/k/a Florence Lustig, trading and doing business as Florence Lustig, Appellant, v. FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., Appellee. FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., Appellant, v. Florence Lustig CROSSMAN, a/k/a Florence Lustig, trading and doing business as Florence Lustig, Appellee.

No. 21999.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 10, 1965.

See also 323 F.2d 937.

*153George 0. Kluttz, Miami, Fla. (Robert C. Ward, Miami, Fla., Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel), for appellantappellee.

Richard P. Kenney, Williams, Salomon & Kenney, Miami, Fla., for appellee-appellant.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and DYER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed to the extent that the appellant is to recover the principal amount of $6,000 and attorney’s fees of $1,500. The cross-appéllant is correct in its challenge of the inclusion in the judgment of the items for travel expense of witnesses and witness fees. There is no basis in the law for the allowance of these two items.

As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.
346 F.2d 152

Case Details

Name
Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.
Decision Date
May 10, 1965
Citations

346 F.2d 152

Jurisdiction
United States
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!