Osborne v. Employment Security Dept. 88 Nev. 588, 502 P.2d 986

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the record does not support a decision of the Board of Review, Employment Security Department, the effect of which was to deny him unemployment benefits in the sum of $599. In our view, said decision is supported by substantial evidence, which warranted a determination that twice within a two week period, in order to obtain unreduced benefits, appellant falsely stated he had been totally unemployed.

Affirmed.