141 Fla. 886 194 So. 333

In Re: Estate of Mato Belin, Deceased, Edna Delonis Belin v. Frank Belin, et al.

194 So. 333

En Banc

Opinion Filed February 20, 1940

Rehearing Denied March 14, 1940

W. H. Mizett, for Appellant;

Earnest & Lczvis and Coleman & Cook, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Chapman are of the opinion that the decree in this cause should be reversed while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Ti-iomas are of the opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court sitting six members in a body and after full consideration, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and decreed under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Wi-iitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Estate of Belin v. Belin
141 Fla. 886 194 So. 333

Case Details

Name
Estate of Belin v. Belin
Decision Date
Feb 20, 1940
Citations

141 Fla. 886

194 So. 333

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!