4 Ohio Law Abs. 96 4 Abs. 40

STATE ex v. THISTLE DOWN CLUB

No. 19549.

Supreme Court

Dock. Jan. 9, 1926;

4 Abs. 40.

Attorneys — C. C. Crabbe, H. H. Griswold, Wilbur E. Benoy, all of Columbus.

The Attorney General alleges in the petition filed herein that the Thistle Down Jockey Club, Inc., is an Ohio- Corporation; that it has acquired grounds and built structures for conducting meets, contests and races; that the Club has employed devices and apparatus for recording wagers on the outcome of horse taces; in violation of the Constitution and statutes of Ohio; and that this practice will continue in the future unless prevented by the order and judgment of this court.

The prayer asks for a judgment of ouster and for the appointment of trustees to liquidate the affairs of the club.

State v. Thistle Down Club
4 Ohio Law Abs. 96 4 Abs. 40

Case Details

Name
State v. Thistle Down Club
Decision Date
Jan 9, 1926
Citations

4 Ohio Law Abs. 96

4 Abs. 40

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!