There is no bill of exceptions, and the only question presented by the record is the right of the clerk of the circuit court to issue the warrant of arrest returnable to the circuit court. The action of the lower court in holding this to be authorized by local statute is affirmed, on authority of Roseberry v. State, 20 Ala. App. 450, 103 So. 898; Reese v. State, 16 Ala. App. 430, 78 So. 460; Daniel v. State, 20 Ala. App. 677, 104 So. 920. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
21 Ala. App. 685 •
108 So. 925
(108 So. 925)
Roney MATHIAS v. STATE.
(8 Div. 387.)
(Court of Appeals of Alabama.
April 20, 1926.)
E. D. Johnston, of Huntsville, for appellant. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.
Mathias v. State
21 Ala. App. 685 •
108 So. 925
Case Details
21 Ala. App. 685
108 So. 925
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!