The facts in this case are similar to those in Woodcock v. McQueen, 11 Ind. R. 14, and the conclusion therein arrived at is decisive in the case at bar.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Wednesday, June 15.
APPE AL from the Bartholomew Circuit Court-.
W. Herod and S. Stansifer, for the appellant.
N. T. Hauser, for the appellee.
The facts in this case are similar to those in Woodcock v. McQueen, 11 Ind. R. 14, and the conclusion therein arrived at is decisive in the case at bar.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
12 Ind. 482
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!