9 N.Y.2d 680

Michael Pruzan et al., Appellants, v. Board of Education of City of New York, Respondent.

Submitted January 11, 1961;

decided January 19, 1961.

*681Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Leo A. Larkin of counsel), for motion to dismiss appeal and opposed to motion for a certificate that a constitutional question was involved, etc.

Harold G. Israelson and Arnold B. Streit for motion for a certificate that a constitutional question was involved, etc., and opposed to motion to dismiss appeal.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the ground there are questions involved other than the constitutional validity of a statute (N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 7, subd. [2]; Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 4).

Motion for a certificate that a constitutional question is involved on the appeal herein denied.

Motion to dispense with the printing of Legislative Document No. 32 in the. record denied.

Motion for a preference denied.

Pruzan v. Board of Education
9 N.Y.2d 680

Case Details

Name
Pruzan v. Board of Education
Decision Date
Jan 19, 1961
Citations

9 N.Y.2d 680

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!