39 Cust. Ct. 558

(Reap. Dec. 8890)

Entry No. 2874-H.

Sipanam, Inc. v. United States

(Decided June 27, 1957)

Sharretts, Paley & Carter for the plaintiff.

George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to merchandise, described in the stipulation of submission as “seamless steel A. P. I. oil well casing, grades J-55 and N-80,” that was shipped from Antwerp, Belgium, and entered at Houston, Tex.

The agreed set of facts, upon which counsel for the respective parties submitted the case, establishes that export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for ap-praisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value is “$150. per metric ton for all sizes .of grade J-55 casing and $182. per metric ton for all sizes of grade N-80 casing,” and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Sipanam, Inc. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 558

Case Details

Name
Sipanam, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date
Jun 27, 1957
Citations

39 Cust. Ct. 558

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!